The following is the transcipt of Sunday's sermon from the theme, The Doubting Sessions.
I remember the day I sat in the Associate Pastor’s office at my church growing up in Galesburg, Illinois, and he talked to me about becoming a pastor. He knew that I was struggling with some career decisions as for some reason the guidance counselors in high school pressed upon the sophomores (yes, I was only a sophomore) to start discerning their future. Perhaps they forgot that 75% of all college students change their majors anyway. But being only a sophomore in high school and being the kid of person I was (and still am today) I stewed for many days over what the future held for me. Lawyer? Doctor? Major League Baseball Umpire?
Pastor? Now that was a new one. I had a good laugh when I told him about our Shumaker family history and even more so our Shumaker family dynamics and habits. But he kept pressing me on this issue, trying to affirm me. But as the conversation took a more serious turn, we started down the path of theology. I remember saying to him “Rev. Kacick, it would be really hard for me to consider being a pastor with my family and all and besides I really have a tough time believing to begin with.”
“Believing what?” He pressed further.
“It’s this whole science thing. Were Adam and Eve cave people? There is no reference to prehistoric creatures in the Bible, and what about the Big Bang Theory (not the show but the scientific theory of the origin of the universe?”
See I used to be smart but I stopped going to school. But our science backgrounds have seemed to stand in conflict with the stories of faith and have proved to be a block for us in our comprehension of the work of God in our lives. In his book, The Reason for God (the basis of our theme of the Doubting Sessions), Timothy Keller draws on some the top authors of our day who suggest that science in general and evolutionary science in particular has made belief in God unnecessary and obsolete. Concludes one author, “you can not be an intelligent scientific thinker and still hold religious beliefs … it has to be one or the other.” Is he right? Has science disproved Christian belief? Must we chose? Have millions of Christians or billions of religious types through the history of the world been so wrong?
A few weeks ago, I asked you to define religion, today I ask you to define the word science. That’s our question for this morning. I invite you to turn to your neighbor this morning and come up with a definition you can both live with. What is science? Please, no electronic devices to use the internet, so put your crackberrys away. I will give you 30 seconds. What is science?
Wikipedia suggests Science (from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge" or "knowing") is the effort to discover and increase human understanding of how physical reality works. The “authoritative Merriam Webster’s Dictionary defines science as the state of knowing: knowledge as distinguished from ignorance or misunderstanding. Hmmm. Now if we were to hold religion and science or Christianity and Science in opposition or as either/or, then does that mean faith or matters of faith are of ignorance or formed in misunderstanding? Does it mean that Christians have a lack of understanding of reality? Man alive, no wonder it is so hard to be a pastor, to have to deal with you people. Just kidding.
We have to remember, that this too is a worldview or a religion itself. We asked what religion was a few weeks ago and one of the definitions was that it was our set of answers to the questions of life, Science can be one of those ways to achieve some of those answers.
There are actually two main areas where we see the conflict of the bible and science, or better where the arguments originate, the questions of creation and miracles or the resurrection. Interestingly enough we don’t take issue with the writings of Paul, the words of the Psalms or the prophets or the books of history. Though some discredit the Bible completely and some take it literally word for word, the conflict with science is with the debate of Darwinism and Creationism AND how to interpret the miracles of Jesus and his resurrection and both of these topics have been going for years.
There are actually two main areas where we see the conflict of the bible and science, or better where the arguments originate, the questions of creation and miracles or the resurrection. Interestingly enough we don’t take issue with the writings of Paul, the words of the Psalms or the prophets or the books of history. Though some discredit the Bible completely and some take it literally word for word, the conflict with science is with the debate of Darwinism and Creationism AND how to interpret the miracles of Jesus and his resurrection and both of these topics have been going for years.
A few months ago, an angry person came across my blog on skepticism and he brought up this topic of creationism vs. Darwinism This other blogger spoke with eloquence in proving his points but he offered them in such a way that he spoke in absolutes. In trying to be done with the conversation, I suggested that this was just an old debate of the 1970’s (how would I know I was born in 75). But this isn’t just a debate of the 1970’s, but even today this very question is given publicity in the schools as to which curriculum should be taught, and also the already discussions on stem cell research, in vitro fertilization, and other areas of medicine.
But as to whether evolution disproves the Bible, I can venture down that road discerning that there will not be a head on collision. We look to Genesis one and say that God created the world in six days, so what about the apes, the dinosaurs, the cavemen. But read on. Genesis 2 tells the story of creation without the specific days. There are high points in the Bible that have two tellings. The passing through the Red Sea appears in Exodus 14 and 15 … they slightly differ. Judges 4 and 5 tell the story of a battle … they slightly differ. There always debates as to why there are two accounts … but the second telling in each of these situations offers the poetic side of the event … a recitation that would be used in ancient Jewish worship services. Sure we can say that to God a day is much longer than our definition of a day. But what we know is this … in the beginning God created. This week read both Genesis 1 and 2 and see how the world unfolds, one as the poetic worship song, the other in seeing the beauty of God’s love poured out. I can go on and on for hours about how we look to Holy Scripture to help us explain, perhaps we can explore that in another setting.
There is no one true Christian position on evolution, but perhaps they to not have to be held in opposition to one another. Perhaps they both work to explain the other. Evolution as an all encompassing theory has it’s flaws. But there are many things that science cannot prove that religion explains and there are things that religion cannot prove that science explains .. they are not meant to be held in opposition to one another.
The question is, can we live with both? In many ways, people push religion off on matters of the heart and suggest that science is a matter of the mind. Can we love, live, and believe with both the heart and mind? Absolutely, it is the nature of who we are. It is possible for our heart felt faith and the scientific questions and challenges in our minds to coexist and when they do, we deepen our relationship to God. When I started to love Jesus with my mind, I could begin to answer some of those questions and see Jesus in a whole new light for what he truly was to a whole population of people who needed to hear the love and connection for them.
The other matter is the miracles of Jesus and his resurrection that are often subject to scientific criticism. So I want us to look at the scripture following Jesus’ resurrection in Matthew 28. Again this is right after our Easter story of the tomb being empty. Matthew 28:11-20.
The other matter is the miracles of Jesus and his resurrection that are often subject to scientific criticism. So I want us to look at the scripture following Jesus’ resurrection in Matthew 28. Again this is right after our Easter story of the tomb being empty. Matthew 28:11-20.
Like the Da Vinci Code suggested in its movie, there were many theories as to the disappearance of Jesus body. This, taken right out of scripture is one that has been widely spread that indeed it was a plot by the disciples to take the body. But what I want to point out is verse 17, “while they (the disciples) worshiped him, some doubted.” This post resurrection Jesus appears to them. Easter has happened. Yet in the midst of worship, some doubted. The very founders of Christianity still had doubt. We are not the only ones to struggle or be questioned, it is in our Christian DNA as disciples.
But also it is the point of miracles that we are to see here. It isn’t necessarily the point of a miracle to cognitive belief, but to be in awe and wonder and in worship. Jesus’ miracles or the resurrection were not magic tricks, but they were expressions of love to show the sick healing and wholeness, to feed the hungry, to raise us from death, and to bring peace to our stormy lives.
There is a lot to be said about the nature of whether to take scripture literally or not … but as we have discovered here that when we dive deep into the scriptures there are many, many meanings. And so we take our experiences and we look at how they are brought out in scripture and how we measure who we are in light of the mission of Jesus Christ. It is ok to live with these questions of discernment and doubt and to allow others to question us, but the reality is we have to avoid the absolutes and allow our doubt to let us question with our hearts and our minds.
So there I sat in that office that day. A sophomore in high school scared to death at the prospect of being a pastor and filled with doubt … but his answer will always stick with me … “Brad, we know in the beginning God … the first words of the Bible, but how God unfolds the rest is in God’s hands.” We have to trust that scripture is being lived out in us and our story is God’s story in us. That God is creating, redeeming, and sustaining us. That God is giving us proof in our own living and dying.
So there I sat in that office that day. A sophomore in high school scared to death at the prospect of being a pastor and filled with doubt … but his answer will always stick with me … “Brad, we know in the beginning God … the first words of the Bible, but how God unfolds the rest is in God’s hands.” We have to trust that scripture is being lived out in us and our story is God’s story in us. That God is creating, redeeming, and sustaining us. That God is giving us proof in our own living and dying.
Are we just a random collection of cells that exist in the midst of the rest of this creation without real purpose or direction? Or is there such a thing as destiny or purpose or relationship to one another or a higher being?
My friend was telling me this week that as they sat around the table at a restaurant celebrating his grandchildren’s birthdays, that he paused during the dinner hour to look around the table. And as he looked at each of his grandchildren around the table, he started to tear up dreaming about their potential. As he looked in each face he wondered what they would become and who they would grow up to be and who they would love and what their purpose would be. Is God any different?
So let me ask you this … can you honestly stand on the beach and look our into the horizon at its vastness and endlessness and suggest that there is no Creator? Or can you stand in the meadow with the breeze sweeping through you and believe that this just so happens? Or can you watch the trees turn their colors in the fall or watch the mountains mirror themselves in the lakes below and believe that we just evolved to that point?
Can you see the love poured out in Mexico or youth bending their knees to the poor of Appalachia and believe that would still happen without Jesus Christ miraculous power on this earth? Can you say there are no miracles when you see the power of reconciliation happen between you and someone you love or when you see friends walk side by side with those in pain or those suffering from terminal illnesses … is that possible without Christ showing us how to do that in his ministry? You tell me …
“When they saw him, they worshiped him, but some doubted.” Then they went into all nations with that truth … I am with you til the very end. There is a relationship that science can not explain … but we know it to be true.
In Jesus Name, Amen.
In Jesus Name, Amen.